Legal Opinion

Price v. Brown

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 15, 1850PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Subrogate.

The instrument propounded for probate is dated, and purports on its face to have been exe*292cuted, the sixth day of May, 1828, and the validity of its execution must he determined under the provisions of the statute then existing, and will not he impaired hy the changes made in the law hy the ¡Revised Statutes. (2 S. S., 3d ed., jp. 133, § 92.) It consists of a printed blank filled in writing, as to those parts which were left open for the name of the testatrix, "and her particular testamentary provisions. The attestation clause is also printed, with blanks filled in writing with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jackson, ex dem. Kellogg v. VickoryNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  2. Jackson ex dem. Le Grange v. Le GrangeNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  3. Turner v. TurnerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1822

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tevis v. PitcherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
  2. In re proving the last will & testament of RosenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1917
  3. In re the Contested Probate of the Last Will & Testament of SniffinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API