Legal Opinion

People v. Sidney M.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 27, 1984No. A023893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BARRY-DEAL, J.

On appeal from a judgment of the juvenile court committing him to the California Youth Authority, Sidney M. (hereafter appellant or the minor) contends that the court committed reversible error when it conducted a portion of the jurisdiction hearing in his absence. We hold that the juvenile court properly found that appellant had voluntarily absented himself from the proceedings and that no error occurred when the court continued to conduct the hearing although appellant was not present. We affirm. 1

I. Facts

The details of the underlying offenses are not relevant to the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Richard M. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Smith v. Mitchell P.California Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Beckley v. Aaron N.California Court of Appeal · 1977
  5. State in Re SchreuderUtah Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. MuhammadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
  2. E.People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API