Legal Opinion

Narducci v. Tedrow

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 30, 2000No. 19A04-0006-CV-230PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPÍNION

BAKER, Judge

Appellants-defendants Dr. Audrey A. Narducci and Memorial Hospital and Health Care Center (the hospital), appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for summary judgment. Specifically, they contend that the trial court erred in concluding that the doctrines of “res ipsa lo-quitur” and “common knowledge” apply to the plaintiff-appellee, Dale Tedrow’s, medical malpractice claim against Dr. Narducci and the hospital. Thus, they contend that Tedrow should have been required to present expert testimony regarding the requisite standard of care in order to establish…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. USA Life One Insurance v. NuckollsIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Butler Ex Rel. Butler v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Shull v. B.F. Goodrich Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Vogler v. DominguezIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Malooley v. McIntyreIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Mischelle Musser and Michael Musser v. Gentiva Health Services, F/k/a Olsten Health ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  2. Syfu v. QuinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Gipson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Ross v. OlsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Golden Corral Corporation v. Kristina M. LenartIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API