Frederick J. X. Martin v. Donald W. Wyrick
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Circuit Judge.
In Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975), decided June 30, 1975, the Supreme Court held that a defendant has a constitutional right of self-representation in the conduct of his or her own defense in a criminal case. The Court declared that a defendant could not be forced to accept court-appointed counsel if a knowing and voluntary waiver of counsel has been made. Frederick Martin here maintains that the district court’s order granting him habeas corpus relief properly accorded Faretta a limited retroactive effect by applying the new…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Edward L. Flanigan v. Burlington Northern Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
- Keltner v. KeltnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
- State v. HorseyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- United States ex rel. Hairston v. WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Toliver v. WyrickDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1979
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.