Legal Opinion
Beasley v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Kansas
Decided June 21, 1984No. 55,930PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Abbott, J.:
This action was brought by the plaintiff, David Beasley, to recover personal injury protection (PIP) benefits under an automobile insurance policy issued by the defendant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm). The trial court awarded plaintiff PIP benefits in the amount of $6,680.
State Farm’s insured, Eddie Benton, was engaged in the trash hauling business. The insured vehicle was a truck with a trash compactor attached to it. The plaintiff was employed by Benton and worked on the trash truck. He was injured when his right arm was caught under the trash…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Henderson v. Hawkeye-Security Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
- Madden v. Farm Bureau Mutual Automobile Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1948
- Wolf v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, PennsylvaniaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1954
- Hendricks v. American Employers Insurance Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
- Lokos v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1949
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991
- Northern Assurance Co. of America v. Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1991