Legal Opinion

Calista Corp. v. DeYoung

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1977No. 2590PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ERWIN, Justice.

This appeal presents four major contentions of error 1 arising from an order entered by the lower court affecting certain property rights in stocks issued pursuant to the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act. 2 The issues necessarily decided on appeal of this case will be addressed after a statement of the facts.

This is an equitable action in the nature of a complaint for injunctive relief. The proceedings below were instituted by the Attorney General for the State of Alaska on behalf of mothers entitled to child support payments under existing court orders and also on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Klein v. United Theaters Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
  2. In re the Summary Investigation of the Election of Directors of Schwartz & Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  3. State, Ex Rel. Ickes v. SlingerOhio Court of Appeals · 1946
  4. Klein v. United Theaters Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1947

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Eschenhagen v. ZikaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Anderson v. Department of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Brown v. WardAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Brown v. WardAlaska Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API