Legal Opinion
United States v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard, United States of America v. Norman Z. Flick and Lowell G. Maynard
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 11, 1983No. 81-3038, 81-3074, 81-3039 and 81-3075PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Flick and Maynard were charged in two indictments with crimes arising from two separate episodes. In one indictment Flick and Maynard were charged with conspiring to steal furniture traveling as a part of an interstate shipment, 18 U.S.C. § 371, and with possessing the stolen furniture, 18 U.S.C. § 659. In the other indictment Flick and Maynard were charged with conspiring to commit mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 371; Flick and Maynard were also respectively charged with one and four counts of mail fraud, 18 U.S.C. § 1341. The two indictments were tried separately…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. Robert McPartlinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Miguel SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Alex J. RaineriCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Melanie Hanson Johnson and Gerard Stanley Johnson, in Re Federal Skywalk Cases. In Re Jacqueline N. RauCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Roy H. HammCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. KayeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
- United States v. Carney GoodmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.