Mayberry v. Holbrook
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Contract for professional services. Writ dated October 27, 1900. At the trial in the Superior Court Mason, C. J. gave the instructions quoted in the opinion. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in the full amount claimed; and the defendant alleged exceptions.
1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.
This was an action of contract brought by a physician to recover for professional calls as set out in the account annexed in the declaration. The account contained one hundred and twenty-six items, being one for each call.
At the trial the plaintiff, with his books before him, testified upon his examination in chief that he had made that number of calls. Upon cross-examination he testified that he did not keep the run of these calls in his memory, and that without looking at the books he could not tell about their number. It does not appear that the boobs were put in evidence. The defendant…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Guiffre v. CarapezzaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
- Commonwealth v. McDermottMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
- Jaquith v. MorrillMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Director General of Railroads v. Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Holden v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.