Legal Opinion

Roach v. Mamakos

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Zelda Jonas, J.

Plaintiff commenced the above-entitled action against the defendant, John A. Mamakos, under the common-law theory of necessaries.

The court conducted a bench trial with regard to the above-entitled action. The only witness to testify was Don Roach, the plaintiff. The defendant was not present in the courtroom, nor was he subpoenaed by plaintiff to testify.

Plaintiff is the father of Pamela L. Mamakos, who is the daughter of plaintiff, and the former spouse of defendant, John A. Mamakos. The defendant, John A. Mamakos, and Pamela L. *457Mamakos had been living…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Constable v. RosenerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. Medical Business Associates, Inc. v. SteinerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Gilberg v. LennonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  4. Albert C. v. Joan C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Our Lady of Lourdes Memorial Hospital, Inc. v. FreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  2. Southern New Hampshire Medical Center v. HayesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API