Carson S. Kee v. United States of America, Willie J. Johnson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
We have considered the contention of insufficiency of the evidence, and we conclude the evidence was sufficient, though not by a wide margin, to support a conviction of unauthorized use of an automobile (22 D.C.Code § 2204).
We are more concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions for robbing the complainant of two dollars in violation of 22 D.C.Code § 2901, and for transporting a stolen vehicle across state lines in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1964). Obviously more proof is necessary for the Dyer Act charge, dependent on an intent that requires a stealing, than…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- In re LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971