Legal Opinion

Carson S. Kee v. United States of America, Willie J. Johnson v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 13, 1969No. 21877_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We have considered the contention of insufficiency of the evidence, and we conclude the evidence was sufficient, though not by a wide margin, to support a conviction of unauthorized use of an automobile (22 D.C.Code § 2204).

We are more concerned with the sufficiency of the evidence to support the convictions for robbing the complainant of two dollars in violation of 22 D.C.Code § 2901, and for transporting a stolen vehicle across state lines in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2312 (1964). Obviously more proof is necessary for the Dyer Act charge, dependent on an intent that requires a stealing, than…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hirabayashi v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. In re LeeDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1964

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  2. United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  3. United States v. Dennis O. MillerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API