Legal Opinion

Al-Mansur v. County of Alameda

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 30, 2025No. 3:24-cv-06909Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 SABIR AL-MANSUR, Case No. 24-cv-06909-AMO 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTION 9 v. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE 10 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 87, 102 Defendants. 11 12 13 Before the Court is a motion for compensatory attorney’s fees from Defendants County of 14 Alameda, Henry C. Levy, Theody Virrey, and Shahidah J. Williams. The matter is fully briefed 15 and suitable for decision without oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b), Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 78(b). 16 Having read the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Moreno v. City of SacramentoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. HaegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2017

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API