Legal Opinion

Chapman v. Levi-Strauss

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 16, 1985No. 2 CA-CIV 5303PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LIVERMORE, Judge.

Plaintiff, William Chapman, was injured when an explosion at an electrical fuse box caused his pants to ignite seriously burning him. He claimed that the pants manufactured by defendant were defective because they were not made with a fire retardant or because they were sold without a warning of the danger of fire. His appeal from a jury verdict against him is premised on alleged errors of the trial court in excluding evidence offered by him. We have jurisdiction under A.R.S. § 12-2101.

During examination of his expert witness, plaintiff's counsel proposed to qualify a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Jefferey Dale Ellis, Administrator of the Estate of Margaret Ann Ellis, Deceased v. International Playtex, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  3. Jones v. Pak-Mor Manufacturing Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Deyoe v. Clark Equipment Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. JensenArizona Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API