Legal Opinion

Montana State Fund v. Murray

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2005No. 04-576PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Gray

¶ 1 The Workers’ Compensation Court determined that the Montana State Fund, rather than Indemnity Insurance Company of North America, is the workers’ compensation insurer liable for compensation payable for Carl Murray’s occupational disease, including disability and medical expenses for knee replacements. The State Fund appeals, and we affirm.

¶2 While the State Fund raises the overall issue on appeal of whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in holding the State Fund liable for Murray’s occupational disease, it breaks that question down into three subissues which we restate and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hiett v. Missoula County Public SchoolsMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Wilson v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Polk v. Planet InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Best v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Champion International Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gamble v. SearsMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Harrison v. Liberty Northwest InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lanes v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Kruzich v. Old Republic InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kratovil v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API