Legal Opinion

Kirk v. Camden Interstate Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Errar to Circuit Court, Cabell County. Action by Paris Kirk against tbe Camden Interstate Railway Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Brannon, Judge:

This is an action by Paris Kirk against The Camden InterState Railway Company to recover damages for injury from the cars of said company. There was a verdict for One Thousand Dollars for the plaintiff conditional upon a demurrer to evidence entered by the defendant. The court sustained the defendant’s demurrer to evidence. The order of the court is as follows: “It is therefore considered by the Court that the defendant’s demurrer to the evidence aforesaid be and the same is sustained, and that the defendant recover of and from the plaintiff its costs about this suit in this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ritchie County Bank v. BeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Delardas v. Morgantown Water CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Barker v. StephensonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Hunt v. MountsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Myers v. CarnahanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Woodburn v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API