Alexander v. Mulhall
Texas Commission of Appeals
Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before the Hon. Hat. M. Burford. The statement of the case made by the appellant is adopted as sufficiently correct.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Ellis. Tried below before the Hon. Hat. M. Burford. The statement of the case made by the appellant is adopted as sufficiently correct. On the 24th of January, 1876, Joseph Mulhall and Samuel Scaling, partners under the style of Mulhall & Scaling, parties of the first part, and J. F. Alexander & J. D. Beauchamp, parties of the second pa.rt, entered into a written agreement to submit their dealings with each other, from January 1, 1875, to January 1,1876, to arbitration. Ho suit had been commenced. The first agreement is to the effect that the parties of the first and second parts…
1Opinion
UPON REHEARING.
In this case the appellants have made a motion for rehearing upon substantially the same grounds discussed in their briefs on the original hearing, and which we have already considered, furnishing us with no additional authorities upon the subject, and we may add with no additional arguments. In deference to the zeal with which they urge upon us their views of the law of the case, we have carefully reconsidered our judgment, and are all the better. satisfied with its correctness. The vice of the argument of the counsel is illustrated by this excerpt from his brief: £1 The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Owens v. WitheeTexas Supreme Court · 1848
- Offeciers v. DirksTexas Supreme Court · 1847
- Stewart v. KeithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
- Hallack v. MarchIllinois Supreme Court · 1860