Legal Opinion

Heider v. Carr

District Court, W.D. North Carolina

Decided September 25, 2023No. 3:21-cv-00387Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION CASE NO. 3:21-CV-387-RJC-DCK ANGELA LOWE HEIDER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) EUGENE M. CARR III, and CARR ) BLACKWELL & ASSOCIATES, P.C., ) ) Defendants. ) ) THIS MATTER IS BEFORE THE COURT on “Plaintiff’s Motion To Quash Subpoenas” (Document No. 21). This motion has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), and is ripe for disposition. Having carefully considered the motion and the record, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part. I.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Addison Whitney, LLC v. CashionNorth Carolina Business Court · 2020
  4. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Carrier Haulers, Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API