State v. T.L.W.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Judge.
Appellant, the State of Florida, contends that the evidence of appellee’s possession of cocaine was improperly suppressed. We agree.
In an oral motion in limine, appellee alleged that because the state consumed all of the suspect drugs during testing, she had been deprived of her sixth amendment right to confrontation of witnesses against her and her right to due process of law under the state and federal constitutions.
At the hearing on appellee’s motion, the forensic chemist testified that at the time she performed the chemical analysis, she believed it was necessary to…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. HerreraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. ArmstrongDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. AtkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979
- Strahorn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gordon v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State v. WilliamsTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- McDonald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Grindle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.