Legal Opinion · Dissent
Low v. MINICHINO
Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
Decided September 29, 2011No. 28980Published
1Dissent
Dissenting Opinion by
GINOZA, J.
There is much in the majority opinion with which I agree. In particular, I agree that it is appropriate to adopt the three-part test which has similarly been adopted by a number of federal courts and other jurisdictions to determine when fraud constitutes a basis to vacate an arbitration award. See e.g., Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 835 F.2d 1378, 1383 (11th Cir.1988); Seattle Packaging Corp. v. Barnard, 94 Wash.App. 481, 972 P.2d 577 (1999).
I respectfully dissent, however, to the majority’s determination that application of that test to the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- James W. Bonar and Beverly J. Bonar v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., John S. Mc Nally, Jr., Ed LeavenworthCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Karaha Bodas Co. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi NegaraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,863 A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. William F. McCollough Jeanene McCollough Husband and WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Lafarge Conseils Et Etudes, S.A. v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. The Howard P. Foley Company, Counterdefendant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Shearson Hayden Stone, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. Paul LiangCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.