Legal Opinion

Nylander v. Rogers

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 16, 1963PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hall, J.

This suit involves three claims arising out of personal injuries to two plaintiffs, who axe husband and wife. They were, very properly, asserted separately in three counts of a single complaint. R. R. 4:33-1 (a), 4:31-1 and 4:10-2. The first two dealt with the respective personal injuries; the third concerned the husband’s claim for consequential damages specified as the medical expenses of his wife and loss of consortium. This third claim is clearly an independent one. Higgins v. Schneider, 61 N. J. Super. 36, 43 (App. Div. 1960), affirmed o.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Spencer v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1906
  2. Melosh v. Public Service Railway Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
  3. Sullivan v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Rodrigues v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Johnson v. Salem Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Mauro v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. Jackson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  5. Campione v. SodenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API