Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Pforzheimer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Brevoort, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts, are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff is the owner of a building on Woodward avenue, in the city of Detroit, the first floor of which was occupied, up to November 1, 1889, by Charles F. Karpp, under a written lease, the term of which did not expire until May, 1891. The plaintiff claims that defendants became the occupants on November 1, and brings this action for the use and occupation from that date until February, 1890.

The testimony offered in the case tended to show that Karpp was agent for his wife, Annie L. Karpp; that in July, 1888, Mrs. Karpp gave to defendants a chattel mortgage of the goods and merchandise…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Doty v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Thompson v. SanbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baehr v. Penn-O-Tex Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Williams v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API