Legal Opinion

Central Railroad v. Neeld

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 17, 1958PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Jacobs, J.

These are five consolidated appeals from interlocutory orders of the Law Division denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaints filed by the plaintiff railroad companies. Leave to appeal was granted by the Appellate Division (R. R. 2:2-3 (a)) and we certified on our own motion (R. R. 1:10—1 (a)).

Prior to December 10, 1956 the defendant Aaron K. Neeld, Director, Division of Taxation in the Department of the Treasury, made his preliminary determinations of the true value of various Class I and Class II properties of the plaintiff…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Dundee Mortgage Trust Invest. Co. v. CharltonUnited States Circuit Court · 1887
  3. Altschul v. GittingsU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon · 1898

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Central RR Co. v. NeeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
  2. NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  3. County of Bergen v. Port of New York AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  4. Frank v. BrielNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API