Legal Opinion

United States v. Sandra L. Weaver Richard Buschman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2002No. 01-10438, 01-10504PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge.

We must decide whether the “purchase” element of the crime of equity skimming requires proof of the exchange of adequate consideration.

I

Appellants Sandra Weaver and Richard Buschman, together with several co-defendants not involved in this appeal, were indicted, charged with multiple counts of mail fraud and with one count of equity skimming, and subsequently convicted after a bench trial. 1 Weaver was a licensed real estate agent, and Buschman was a licensed broker. The charges against them stemmed from their involvement in a business called “Foreclosure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. National Labor Relations Board v. Amax Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. Darweshi DinkaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. Jeffrey Gaskins, AKA Jeffery GaskinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. Marshall G. Peters and Linda PetersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. CallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  2. Buschman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  3. Montana v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, D. Montana · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API