Legal Opinion

Fath v. Bliss

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Mobile. Heard before the Hon. N. W. Cocke. The facts are contained in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtB. F. Saffold, J.

In March, 1868, the appellee, Bliss, sold to the appellant, Fath, a lot of land in Mobile. Fath paid him for it $1,000 cash, and gave him, for the remainder, two promissory notes — one for $900, payable in twelve months, and the other for $1,000, payable in two years, from the date of the sale. He also executed a mortgage on the land to secure the payment of the notes.

The bill, in this case, is filed to foreclose the mortgage, on account of the non-payment of the last note.

The debtor insists that the contract was one to be discharged with Confederate currency. In support of this, he presents…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wharton v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1871

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API