Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1907No. 15,017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from Atchison district court; Benjamin F. Hudson, judge.

1Per curiam

If the plaintiff’s amended petition were defective, in that it contained no offer to return, the defendant should have attacked it upon that ground. Instead of this he waived the right to be placed in statu quo, answered to the merits, and went to trial upon all the issues tendered. It still remained in the power of the court to require the plaintiff to do equity as a condition to granting her relief, but upon rendering judgment it saw fit to give the plaintiff all she had already obtained. This being true, no right of the defendant has been prejudicially affected, conceding this to be a case…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Capper v. Manufacturers Paper Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Custer v. RoyseSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API