Foster Construction Co. v. Wafer
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
hAMY, Judge.
The plaintiff, a construction company, and the defendant entered into a contract for the construction of a restaurant. The plaintiff contends the defendant failed to honor the contract and seeks out-of-pocket expenses and lost profits. The defendant contends the contract was contingent on his ability to obtain financing. The trial court found in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant appeals. We affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
This matter involves a contract entered into for the construction of a restaurant in Alexandria, Louisiana. The plaintiff, Foster Construction…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dugue v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
- Thibodeaux v. KernLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Peterson v. SutterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1926
- Tom Black & Associates, Inc. v. Thibaut Construction Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Harrington v. OliverLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984