Legal Opinion

City of Olympia v. Lemon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1916No. 13125PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Thurs-ton county, Mitchell, J., entered June 22, 1914, upon findings in favor of the interveners, dismissing proceedings to condemn property for street purposes, after a trial and hearing on objections to the assessment roll.

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action, as originally instituted, was to condemn for street purposes two certain strips of land, each thirty feet wide. The city of Olympia, desiring *509to extend Jefferson street south from Broadway to 18th street, a distance of two blocks, brought the action against the parties who claimed to own the strips of land mentioned. After the condemnation proceedings had been instituted, the Casco Company, a corporation which claimed title to the property by conveyance from the previous owners, consented to a decree of necessity, and agreed to submit the issue as to the value of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Whitesides v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  2. County on Yakima v. ConradWashington Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Primark, Inc. v. Burien Gardens AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Giles v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. City of Seattle v. AbrahamsonWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Hamp v. Pend Oreille CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Van Sant v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API