Legal Opinion

Last v. Winkel

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided January 18, 1916PublishedCited by 5 opinions

On bill to foreclose.

1Opinion of the Court

Griffin, V. C.

The complainant foreclosed his first and fifth mortgages, making the second, third and fourth mortgagees parties. The premises realized at the sale a sum insufficient to' pay the amount due upon the second, third and fourth mortgages after satisfying the amount due the complainant upon his first mortgage. The complainant now seeks to have the rents collected by the receiver appointed in the cause applied on account of the amount due upon his-fifth mortgage, to the exclusion of the second, third and fourth mortgagees, founding his claim upon the allegations and prayer of his bill.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pagano v. United Jersey BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  2. Banfield v. SchuldermanOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Bermes v. KelleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
  4. Stockwell v. Stockwell's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918
  5. Kaplan v. SLEEP E HOLLOW MOTEL CO.S.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API