Kessenich v. Raynor
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GARAUFIS, District Judge.
Defendant Jeanne Raynor (“Raynor”) moves for summary judgment, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b), against Plaintiff Diane Kessenich (“Kessenich”) on the first claim in the Amended Complaint. For the rea sons discussed below, Raynor’s motion is denied.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The facts of this case were set out in extensive detail in this court’s earlier decision on the motion of defendants Kanas, Blake, Jeanne’s Junior Jungle, Inc., and Raynor Country Day School to dismiss. See Kessenich v. Raynor, 120 F.Supp.2d 242 (E.D.N.Y.2000). Without repeating this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- James M. Cronin v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Chemical Bank v. MeltzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Barclays Bank of New York v. GoldmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Kessenich v. RaynorDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Robbins International, Inc. v. Robbins MBW Corp. (In Re Robbins International, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 2002