Legal Opinion

In re Harris

District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1921No. 3804PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy. In the matter of William Harris, bankrupt. On petition by the Miners’ Bank of Wilkes-Barre for review of an order of the referee disallowing a portion of its claim.

1Opinion of the Court

WITMER, District Judge.

The Miners’ Bank of Wilkes-Barre has brought here for review the order of the referee, disallowing portion of its claim proven, in so far as the same relates to attorney’s commission on a note held by the bank against the bankrupt and others.

A promissory note, dated April 27, 1916, for $16,500, with interest at 6 per cent., payable to the bank, was executed and delivered to it by Phillip Harris, Sr., William Plarris, and John Reese. The note contained a power of attorney to enter and confess judgment It also provided allowance for an attorney’s fee:

“An attorney’s foe of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GarlingtonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1902
  2. In re GebhardDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. In re T. H. Thompson Milling Co.District Court, W.D. Texas · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bryant v. BowlesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API