Legal Opinion

Issaia v. Russo-Asiatic Bank

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHofstadter, J.

The defendants National City Bank of New York and Guaranty Trust Company of New York move to vacate an order of publication purporting to give notice to the defendant Russo-Asiatic Bank of the pendency of this action, and upon vacatur for an order staying further proceedings on the ground that the Russo-Asiatic Bank is a necessary party defendant without whose presence no determination of the controversy may be had. The plaintiff, pursuant to section 117 of the Civil Practice Act, by way of cross-motion, renews a motion heretofore denied (N. Y. L. J. Nov. 24, 1933) for the appointment of a…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Dougherty v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Pendleton v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  4. Folger v. Columbian InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
  5. M. Salimoff & Co. v. Standard Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1933

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Douglas v. Mod-Urn Cheese Packing Co.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Rainbow Shop Patchogue Corp. v. Roosevelt Nassau Operating Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API