Rosalsky v. State of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The question to be determined is the validity under the State Constitution of chapter 772 of the Laws of 1928.
By that act, the Legislature attempted to clothe the Court of Claims with jurisdiction to audit and determine “ the claim of any judge or judges of the Court of General Sessions of the county of New York for counsel fees and expenses incurred by him or them in successfully defending any action or proceeding heretofore brought against him or them by reason of any act, decision or judgment arising out of his or their judicial duties since nineteen hundred and twenty.” Upon a finding…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Matter of RichardsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Lange v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- People v. Westchester County National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Chapman v. . City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Beck v. GravesNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
- Locust Club v. City of RochesterNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Cannata v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
- Corrigan v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1931
- Courtesy Sandwich Shop, Inc. v. Port of New York AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.