Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Beamer and Seay

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1926No. 4136PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Pierson

Relators M. R. Beamer and H. B. Seay seek by the writ of habeas corpus to be relieved of an alleged restraint on their liberties, alleging that they are illegally restrained of their liberties by L. J. Polk, Judge of the Ninety-third Judicial District of Texas; A. Y. Baker, Sheriff of Hidalgo County, and A. R. Baker, Constable of Precinct No. 6 of Hidalgo County, acting in their'official capacities as named. As gleaned from the exhibits and the pleadings the facts necessary to a decision of this case may be summarized as follows:

J. T. Ford and D. T. Ford brought suit in the District Court of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte A.D. LipscombTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Ex Parte SnyderCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  3. Ex Parte JonischkiesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ex Parte WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State v. Collazo, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  3. Ex Parte Travis and MathewsTexas Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Ex Parte Benavides, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  5. Ex Parte CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API