Legal Opinion

Dawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1965PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dyeb

This is an appeal, by plaintiff in error, from the action of the trial judg'e in sustaining a demurrer to the declaration filed by defendant in error. In this opinion the parties will be referred to in accord with their status in the trial court, that is, Forrest C. Dawson as plaintiff and Sears Roebuck and Co. as defendant.

The declaration alleged defendant operates a retail store in Nashville, Tennessee and, for the convenience of its customers, maintains a large paved parking lot adjacent to the store. This lot has directional markers painted on the pavement, curbs and islands raised some…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kendall Oil Company v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
  2. Gargaro v. Kroger Grocery & Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
  3. Ill. Cent. R. Co. v. NicholsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Shell Oil Company v. BlanksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1959
  5. Pierce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Eaton v. McLainTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hudson v. GaitanTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Smith v. Inman Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  4. Williams v. Taylor MacHinery, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Mumford v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API