Legal Opinion

Ruthe v. Dohring (In re Dohring)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided January 14, 2000No. Bankruptcy No. 399-33188-RCM-13; Adversary No. 99-3358PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ROBERT McGUIRE, Chief Judge.

On January 10, 1999, came to be heard the Motion of debtor Silvio Dohring (“Defendant” or “Debtor”) to dismiss the above-styled adversary proceeding. Lori Lynette Ruthe (“Plaintiff’) opposed such dismissal. This Court has jurisdiction over this core proceeding under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1334 and 157(b)(2)(I). The foregoing and following are the Court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under Bankruptcy Rule 7052.

Background

The Bankruptcy Rule 4007 deadline for filing a § 523 complaint in this case was August 3,1999. On July 23,1999, Plaintiff filed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. David Petrucelli Tracy A. Petrucelli, Husband and Wife v. Bohringer and Ratzinger, Gmbh Ausdereitungsanlagen Jake Diel Construction MacHine Inc. Teco Electric and MacHine Company, Ltd. v. Excel Recycling & Manufacturing, Inc., Third-Party David Petrucelli and Tracy A. PetrucelliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  2. Thompson v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  3. McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. McGinnis v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. Ditkof v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Premier Capital v. DeCarolisDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2002
  2. Ripa v. PerfettiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API