Legal Opinion
Nitram, Inc. v. Industrial Risk Insurers
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided July 13, 1993No. 85-1770-CIV-T-17PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AWARDING RULE 11 SANCTIONS
KOVACHEVICH, District Judge.
This cause is before the Court on motion to award sanctions made pursuant to Rule 11, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, filed by BARNARD AND BURK ENGINEERS & CONSTRUCTORS, INC. (“BBEC”), BARNARD AND BURK GROUP, INC. (“BARNARD AND BURK”), and INDUSTRIAL RISK INSURERS (“IRI”), (collectively the “Respondents”), against MAN GUTEHOFF-NUNGSHÜTTE Gmbh (“MAN GHH”).
Summary of Relevant Facts
This order addresses Respondents’ Motion for Sanctions to be imposed against MAN GHH in this action pursuant to Rule 11, Fed.R.Civ.P., The Motion to Award…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pierce v. Commercial WarehouseDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1992
- Pretty Punch Shoppettes, Inc. v. Creative Wonders, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
3Cited by4 opinions
- Industrial Risk Insurers v. M.A.N. Gutehoffnungshutte GmbHCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Ballato v. BallatoDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1995
- Industrial Risk Insurers, Barnard & Burk Group, Inc., Barnard and Burk Engineers and Constructors, Inc., Isi, Inc., American Home Assurance Co., Defendants-Third-Party v. M.A.N. Gutehoffnungshutte Gmbh, Third-Party-Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant. Holland & Knight, Mark E. Grantham v. Industrial Risk Insurers, Barnard & Burk Group, Inc., Barnard and Burk Engineers and Constructors, Inc., Isi, Inc., American Home Assurance Co., Defendants-Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Nitram, Inc. v. Industrial RiskCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998