Legal Opinion

Heimbach v. Heimbach

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

Decided November 20, 1944No. 162PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Henninger, J.,

— In this divorce action, this court has not obtained jurisdiction over respondent and, therefore, cannot act upon the master’s recommendation.

As the law now stands (other jurisdictional facts being present), jurisdiction over respondent may be obtained in three ways: (1) By personal service of the subpoena within this Commonwealth (section 27 of The Divorce Law of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237, 23 PS §27); (2) by the entry of an appearance (section 31 of said act, 23 PS §31) ; and (3) by'two returns of “non est inventus” and publication as prescribed by sections 28 and 29 of the same…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. HenaganDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API