Bartholomew v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Arror to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Ellis Bartholomew Was convicted of a criminal offense, and brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERENS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, whom we will style the “defendant,” was convicted in the District Court upon an indictment charging him with violating the provisions of section 5480 of the Revised Statutes (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696), concerning the use of the postal establishment oi aie United States for the promotions of schemes to defraud. The offense charged was that, having formed a scheme to defraud the Bankers’ Money Order Association, a corpora-*903lion doing- business at New York, which scheme involved the use of ihe postal service of the United States, the defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crain v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Claassen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Stokes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hardesty v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Tubbs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Harrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
- Cook v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1948
- Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Landay v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Galbreath v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1918
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.