Legal Opinion
Urbaniak v. Newton
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 14, 1991No. A045593PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
NEWSOM, J.
On October 2, 1987, Gary Urbaniak (hereafter Urbaniak), filed a first amended complaint in the Superior Court of San Francisco against Frederic H. Newton, M.D., Frederick H. Newton, M.D., a Medical Corporation (hereafter Dr. Newton), John J. Párente, Paul D. Karasoff, and Allianz Insurance Co. (hereafter collectively respondents) seeking damages for dissemination of a medical report which disclosed that he had tested positive for the HIV virus. The complaint was based on a series of distinct legal theories including invasion of the right to privacy guaranteed in article I,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Thing v. La ChusaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- American Academy of Pediatrics v. LungrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re Marriage CasesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Chizmar v. MacKieAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
- Ludwig v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.