Legal Opinion

Dunham v. Harvey

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County.—F. H. Heiskell, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McAlister

Complainants, as heirs and devisees of Watt C. Bradford, deceased, filed this ejectment bill to recover possession of certain real estate in the city of Memphis, alleged to have been fraudulently conveyed by the personal representative of said Bradford’s estate.

*623The will of said Watt C. Bradford was admitted to probate in 1864, and contains the following items, which are immediately involved in this litigation:

“Item 2nd. I direct the payment by my executors, hereinafter named, of all of my just debts, out of any moneys now on hand, or to be realized hereafter from collections or from the sale…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Todd v. McClenahanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1803
  2. Gates v. CardTennessee Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Grier v. CanadaTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Winters v. MarchTennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Patton v. HardisonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API