Legal Opinion

Morrill v. Seip

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1881PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Brown District Court. The nature of this action, and the facts, sufficiently appear in the opinion. December 24, 1880, the district judge, at chambers, made a certain interlocutory order in favor of Elizabeth Seip and Anna M. Seip, which order MorriU & Janes have brought here for review.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

On April 8, 1880, plaintiffs commenced their action in the district court of Brown county against Quintus S. Seip, and Elizabeth and Anna M. Seip, children and heirs-at-law of Francis Seip, deceased, to recover upon certain promissory notes executed by Quintus S. Seip and Francis Seip, and to foreclose a mortgage given by Francis Seip to secure the payment of the promissory notes. The defendants being non-residents of the state of Kansas, service *149was made by publication. At the September term of the court for 1880, judgment was entered as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Downing v. ReevesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Taylor v. WoodburySupreme Court of Kansas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API