Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Suit by the Goldschmidt Thermit Company against Primos Chemical Company. On motion to transfer case to the law side of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
It is at least not clear that the status of this case has changed since it was before the court on the prior motion to dismiss the bill. There is, however, practical wisdom in the suggestion made by counsel for defendant that the question of the right, in the assertion of which the defendant is rightfully insistent, should be disposed of at this time in order to save the possible second trial of the case. This is the only justification or excuse even for a discussion which partakes of something of the character of a reargument of the question raised.
At the expense of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- The " Scotland"Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- American Cable Ry. Co. v. Chicago City Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1890
- Heckscher v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1913
- Mershon v. J. F. Pease Furnace Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1885
3Cited by9 opinions
- Pierce v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Kelley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Mobile Shipbuilding Co. v. Federal Bridge & Structural Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Chanslor-Canfield Midway Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1920
- Goldschmidt Thermit Co. v. Primos Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1923
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.