Brown v. Scarborough
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, J.
“Under the ruling in Miller v. Almon, 123 Ga. 104 (50 S. E. 993), in order for this exemption of $300.00 to be effectual as against a waiver, it must have been set apart.” Peppers v. Cauthen, 143 Ga. 229, 234 (84 S. E. 477). The ruling above quoted is controlling on the sole issue in the case. The court did not err in refusing to grant a temporary injunction.
Judgment affirmed.
All the Justices concm', except Russell, O. J., dissenting. Strozier & Beaver and B. Oubbedge Snow, for plaintiff. B. W. Barnes, II. F. Bawls, and F. C. Collins, for defendants.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Peppers v. CauthenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
- Miller v. AlmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilbanks v. WardlawCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
- Sanders v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Kemp v. Swainsboro Ice & Fuel Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933