Legal Opinion

Searle v. Southern Surety Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 11, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLarkin, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover, from the defendant, the amount of a judgment which he had previously recovered against one Whalen, growing out of a collision between the cars of plaintiff and Whalen. The complaint alleges that, prior to the rendition of the judgment, the defendant, through its duly authorized agent, at the city of Salamanca, N. Y., sold to Whalen the defendant’s policy of liability insurance, wherein it agreed to indemnify Whalen against loss from liability imposed by law upon him for damage to property resulting through his operation of his automobile. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hicks v. British America Assurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. L. Lewitt & Co. v. Jewelers' Safety Fund SocietyNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Perlman v. Independence Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dembitzer v. GilliamNew York Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Searle v. Southern Surety Co.New York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Estock v. Associated Hospital ServiceCivil Court of the City of New York · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API