Legal Opinion

Harrington v. Collins

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 3, 1979No. 7811SC390PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Plaintiff argues that the trial court committed error in dismissing the action at the conclusion of plaintiffs evidence. In considering the motion for directed verdict, plaintiff’s evidence must be taken as true and treated in the light most favorable to him. A directed verdict may be granted only if the evidence is insufficient to justify a verdict for plaintiff as a matter of law. Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576, 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1973). A directed verdict on the basis of contributory negligence may be granted only when the evidence, taken in the light most favorable…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Dickinson v. PakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. Williams v. Carolina Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Foster v. . HymanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Brewer v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Winslow v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  2. Hord v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Duffer v. Royal Dodge, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Rector v. JamesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Lewis v. BrunstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API