Legal Opinion
Danz v. Lockhart
Idaho Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1998No. 23658PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LANSING, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order declining to vacate a default judgment against William M. Lockhart. Lockhart moved to set aside the judgment on the basis of excusable neglect, pursuant to I.R.C.P. 60(b)(1). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Lockhart’s motion.
BACKGROUND
This case arises from the sale of a condominium in Blaine County. From 1978 to 1995, Lockhart, a California resident, co-owned the condominium with William and Gayle Barnes. On August 1, 1995, Lockhart transferred his interest to the Barneses by quitclaim deed. The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Minich v. Gem State Developers, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Avondale on Hayden, Inc. v. HallIdaho Court of Appeals · 1983
- Catledge v. Transport Tire Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1984
- Baldwin v. BaldwinIdaho Court of Appeals · 1988
- State, Department of Law Enforcement v. One 1990 Geo MetroIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rivera Báez v. Jaume AndújarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Monarch Greenback, LLC v. Monticello InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1999
- Guillermo Rivera Baez v. Ana J. Jaume AndujarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Piñero Viñales, Luis E v. Municipio De CarolinaTribunal De Apelaciones De Puerto Rico/Court of Appeals of Puerto Rico · 2024
- Vendrell López v. Autoridad De Energía EléctricaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2017