Legal Opinion

Virden v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided April 29, 1927No. Docket No. 5200Published

1. An oral contract of partnership between a husband and wife is valid under the laws of Mississippi. 2. Determination of March 1, 1913, value of certain real estate. 3. Determination of date of repossession of real estate previously sold.

1Opinion of the Court

M. L. VIRDEN, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Virden v. Commissioner

Docket No. 5200.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

6 B.T.A. 1123; 1927 BTA LEXIS 3333;

April 29, 1927, Promulgated

1. An oral contract of partnership between a husband and wife is valid under the laws of Mississippi.

2. Determination of March 1, 1913, value of certain real estate.

3. Determination of date of repossession of real estate previously sold.

Chas. D. Hamel, Esq., Benj. H. Saunders, Esq., and O. R. Ewing, C.P.A., for the petitioner.

J. E. Marshall, Esq., for the respondent.

MILLIKEN

This…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Brooks v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1923
  3. Leinkauf & Strauss v. BarnesMississippi Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Jones v. JonesMississippi Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Porter v. StatenMississippi Supreme Court · 1886

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API