Sandoval v. State

ON APPELLANT’S MOTION FOR REHEARING.

DAVIDSON, Judge.

Appellants insist that the jury was guilty of misconduct, which thereby warranted a new trial, and that we erred in reaching a contrary conclusion.

Giving to the facts touching the question the most favorable construction possible from appellants’ standpoint, the follownig appears:

The prosecutrix, a thirteen-year-old female, testified to acts of sexual intercourse with the appellants without her consent.

The written confession of each of the appellants admitted the act of intercourse with the female, with her consent, for which each paid her a…