Conte v. Conte

*236 Opinion

In this appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) failed to modify the judgment of dissolution of marriage by ordering the defendant to subordinate his mortgage on property of the plaintiff so that the plaintiff could refinance the property, (2) denied the plaintiffs motion for advice with respect to an arbitrator’s division of personal property and (3) levied a fine of $100 against the attorney for the plaintiff.

In reviewing the modification issue, the question before us is whether the trial court abused its discretion. See Borkowski v. Borkowski, 228 Conn.…