Legal Opinion

Hansen v. Sweet

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 18, 1985No. 15516PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BAKES, Justice.

The sole issue on appeal is the division of crop share rental proceeds between a purchaser and vendor, where the purchaser has defaulted and forfeited all interest in real property to the vendor. We reverse the district court and hold 1 that: the purchaser is entitled to crop share rentals on crops severed prior to forfeiture, less the landlord’s share of expenses incurred prior to forfeiture; and the vendor is entitled to crop share rentals for crops severed after forfeiture, less the landlord’s share of expenses incurred after forfeiture.

Mark Hansen was the “vendor,” and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fritcher v. KelleyIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
  2. FIRST SEC. BANK OF IDAHO, NA v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Davis v. PancheriIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Peacock v. BradshawIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ferguson v. SullivanIdaho Supreme Court · 1937

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First State Bank of Eldorado v. RoweIdaho Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API