Legal Opinion

Estate of Maresi v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided March 26, 1946No. Docket No. 6783PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Oppek, Judge:

It is now well settled that a separation agreement fixing the scope of the husband’s obligation'of support and incorporated in a decree of divorce furnishes a foundation for deduction from the husband’s gross estate of amounts paid accordingly. E. g., Edythe C. Young, Executrix, 39 B. T. A. 230; Estate of Silas B. Mason, 43 B. T. A. 813; Fleming v. Yoke (Dist. Ct., N. Dist. W. Va.), 53 Fed. Supp. 552; affirmed without opinion (C. C. A., 4th Cir.), 145 Fed. (2d) 472. So much respondent concedes, while expressing his disagreement with the conclusion reached. No reason is…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ithaca Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Humes v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  3. Robinette v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Estate of Van Horne v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Indiana Broadcasting Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  3. Watson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. Lester v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1972
  5. Arents v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1960

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API